I just read May Sarton's 1965 novel, Mrs. Stevens hears the mermaids singing, which is an idiosyncratic but engaging story. I was drawn through it by a sense of familiarity, catching myself in realization that the narrator's thought processes and ways of gaining perspective were much like my own. That a story-line unfolded along with the inner workings of the main character's mind was somewhat of a surprise. Stream of consciousness often comes across as meandering and plotless, but letting readers into Mrs. Stevens thoughts turned out to not just give us character blathering along (not totally anyway), but was obviously a carefully constructed tool by which readers are able to follow Mrs. Stevens reflections on her life as she prepares for and gives an interview after publishing a recently well-received volume of poetry.
Sarton relies very heavily on notions which she simultaneously challenges, and because they've been challenged by her and writers after her, those ideas seem particularly outdated. Due, in large part to resistance by people who were being studied, essentialization has fallen out of favor in recent years as sociologists and anthropologists have tried to come to terms with an academic heritage that tended to make sweepingly general but bindingly close-minded assumptions about groups of people. Sarton approaches the conflicts encountered by Mrs. Stevens by trying to dig to the "essential" natures of maleness and femaleness as they relate to creativity, sexuality, and social expectation. Coming at this from a sort of "post-modern" conceptual paradigm in which I recognize that identities are fluid, I was also aware that this book was really a response to the culture of the time.
Being able to read this with an awareness of what the author was attempting to do while recognizing how many of our ideas have changed, allowed me to get beyond some of the work's limitations.
The lengthy forays into Stevens' musings has been described as self-indulgent. I would agree except for the fact that Sarton's skill at turning the self-indulgent toward the aim of the book makes it seem that she's done nothing at all but let her main character ramble. Truth is, for as long as I've been keeping a journal and trying to catch hold of my own slippery-fish of a mind (wish me luck with that one!), I can recognize the authenticity of the character Mrs. Stevens and respect Sarton's ability to know herself and her character well enough to be able to pull the whole story together out of the vagaries of her character's mind.
There were moments when the story or the writing seemed forced, though, which caused me to wonder about the author's shortcomings (when I would rather have been fully immersed in the story). Considering that this book's progressive handling of sexuality (Mrs. Stevens has both men and women lovers and this is openly addressed) is celebrated by many, I found that the relationships were clunky - either they seemed unrealistic or too dramatic and they just didn't contribute to an otherwise believable character.
Throughout, though, I kept jotting down sections that spoke to me. There is much that creative people have in common, and the experience of many women artists is similar. Likewise, I was heartened by the fact that I found a story in which I not only came to know the characters, but I came to know myself - for Mrs. Stevens touches on some very essential truths, regardless of whether or not it's taboo to speak in such generalizations. In this regard, I reject that academic doubt. We do have things in common with each other, in spite of our many ways of being in and experiencing the world.
So, all in all, this is not an action-filled book - it's about a person's reflecting on her life. I enjoyed its slow pace and the validation I received of my own experience in trying to lead a creative, visioning life. This leads me to consider this in two sections, then. This first section, The Book, is more or less a review of what Sarton accomplished with the book, what its consistency as a work of fiction is, while the next, The Subject, deals with the issues Sarton was addressing.